All events
Sports · 11 markets

ITF WOMEN - SINGLES: W15 Tianjin 4 (China), hard: Priska Madelyn Nugroho vs Rinko Matsuda

Vol total$427
Vol 24h$427
Liquidity$8K
Resolves7d
NugrohovsMatsudaFINAL · sets 2-0
🎾 Tennis · Priska Madelyn Nugroho vs Rinko Matsuda · S1 Nugroho · S2 Nugroho
$427 apostados
Nugroho 100.0%0.1% Matsuda
Match winnerGana 2-0 secoGames 21.5Nugroho
100.0%$417
100.0%paga 1.00×
O 0.1%$10
Matsuda
0.1%
0.1%
U 100.0%paga 1.00×
🎾 ¿Se va a 3 sets?total de sets O/U 2.5
0.1%
No 100.0%paga 1.00×
🎯 Por setganador y games de cada set · 4 mercados
Set 2 · ganador
Set 2 · games O/U 8.5
Set 2 · games O/U 9.5
Set 2 · games O/U 10.5
📊 Más líneastotales alternos y especiales
Games del match O/U 22.5
Games del match O/U 23.5
¿El match se completa?
ITF WOMEN - SINGLES: W15 Tianjin 4 (China), hard: Priska Madelyn Nugroho vs Rinko Matsuda Match O/U 22.5
ITF WOMEN - SINGLES: W15 Tianjin 4 (China), hard: Priska Madelyn Nugroho vs Rinko Matsuda Match O/U 23.5

Resolution rules

This market refers to the tennis match between Priska Madelyn Nugroho and Rinko Matsuda in the ITF WOMEN - SINGLES: W15 Tianjin 4 (China), hard, originally scheduled for August 26, 2026 at 10:00PM ET. This market will resolve to 'Priska Madelyn Nugroho' if Priska Madelyn Nugroho advances against Rinko Matsuda. This market will resolve to 'Rinko Matsuda' if Rinko Matsuda advances against Priska Madelyn Nugroho. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or a winner has not been determined by September 9, 2026, 11:59 PM ET (14 days after the scheduled start), this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.