Sports · 7 markets

W15 Yeongwol: Jiyun Oh vs Soo Ha Jang

Vol total$57K

Vol 24h$57K

Liquidity$18K

Resolves7d

Your bet

Every card is one question. Tap Yes if you think it happens, No if you don't. Each button shows the chance the market gives it, what your $10 becomes if you're right (stake included), and the profit. Wrong = you lose your $10, never more. No is everything that isn't Yes.

Result1 question

Jiyun Oh win?decided · No

YESJiyun Oh winNOSoo Ha Jang win

Settles: Official final score.

Sets & games2 questions

Jang win by 2 or more sets?decided · Yes

YESJang win by 2+ setsNOJang win by less or lose

Settles: Final margin of victory.

Set 2: Oh wins?decided · No

YESOh wins set 2NOJang wins set 2

Settles: Winner of set 2.

Halves & periods1 question

Set 2: 10 or more games?

YES10 or more games in totalNO9 or fewer · Exactly 9 counts as No.

Other lines:

Settles: Total games in the set 2 only.

Moments1 question

Match played to the end?

YESNo retirement or walkoverNORetirement or walkover

Settles: Whether the match is completed.

Resolution rules

This market refers to the tennis match between Jiyun Oh and Soo Ha Jang in the W15 Yeongwol, Qualifying, originally scheduled for August 31, 2026 at 9:00PM ET. This market will resolve to 'Jiyun Oh' if Jiyun Oh advances against Soo Ha Jang. This market will resolve to 'Soo Ha Jang' if Soo Ha Jang advances against Jiyun Oh. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or a winner has not been determined by September 14, 2026, 11:59 PM ET (14 days after the scheduled start), this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.